Vision Care Utilization and Insurance Coverage Prior to and Following Medicaid Expansion in Ohio

Authors

  • Dean A. VanNasdale College of Optometry, The Ohio State University
  • Matthew L. Robich College of Optometry, The Ohio State University
  • Lisa A. Jones-Jordan College of Optometry, The Ohio State University
  • Erica R. Shelton College of Optometry, The Ohio State University
  • Megan S. Hurley College of Optometry, The Ohio State University
  • Andrew Wapner College of Public Health, The Ohio State University
  • Sherry Williams Prevent Blindness, Ohio Affiliate
  • David Monder Prevent Blindness, Ohio Affiliate
  • Marcus J. Molea Prevent Blindness, Ohio Affiliate
  • John E. Crews Private Consultant

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v5i1.8685

Keywords:

Vision, Epidemiology, Surveillance, Insurance, BRFSS, Trend analysis

Abstract

Background: Increased access and utilization of vision care services has the potential to reduce preventable vision loss. The state of Ohio has been uniquely proactive when collecting vision-oriented data through population health surveys, including the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). These data can be used to better understand vision care utilization patterns and access to insurance.

Methods: Responses to 3 items administered in the Ohio BRFSS that assess vision care utilization and insurance coverage were compared between 2 different administration periods, 2005-2011 and 2018-2019, using chi-square tests. Comparable data from 2 items assessing eye care utilization were available in 2005-2011 and 2019. Comparable data for insurance coverage were available in 2005-2011 and in 2018-2019. Responses were further stratified by population characteristics, including age, gender, household income, and education level.

Results: The percentages of those reporting eye exams in the previous year were not significantly different between 2005-2011 and 2019 (chi-square, p = 0.06). In Ohio, the primary reason for not seeing a vision care provider in the past 12 months was “No reason to go” in 2005-2011 and in 2019. The second most common reason for not seeing a vision care provider in the past 12 months was “Cost/insurance,” which decreased between 2005-2011 and 2019 (chi-square, p <0.001). Insurance coverage for eye care increased between 2005-2011 and 2018-2019 (chi-square, p <0.001).
Important differences were found within the demographic stratification.

Conclusion: Population health surveillance data provide useful insight into vision care utilization and insurance coverage. Despite the increase in insurance coverage, eye care provider utilization remains relatively stable.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-24

Issue

Section

Research Articles